Magic Johnson and Rob Pelinka were hired to run the front office of the Los Angeles
Lakers approximately one year ago and while they have remained steadfast in their
plan to maximize their 2018 cap space, the team has yet to show a real
improvement.
There also may be issues between Johnson, who has the final say on the roster, and Pelinka,
who is running the day-to-day operations.
"I have been told by multiple sources that Magic Johnson is doing that job the way that I
thought Magic Johnson was going to do that job," said Dan Le Batard "Sort
of whisking in and out of the office. ‘Yeah fire everyone. Trade everyone.
You’re doing a bad job. I’m going to run my movie empire.’ Is he
still doing that? The details, the specifics of the doing of that job. Magic Johnson
has been given all of the power and isn’t doing any of the work that usually
gets done. He’s doing the job the way Phil Jackson did the
job.
"He’s pretty mad at (Rob) Pelinka from what I’ve heard."
When Johnson was hired by the Lakers in 2017, Le Batard criticized his credentials.
I'm not sure if LeBatard has sources with the Lakers, but I know he has sources with other
teams around the league. Interesting if this is true.
TimmyDoe Die-Hard Laker FanPosts: 1714votes: 23
01/30/2018 - 02:01 PM
I’ve said in another thread that I don’t mind Pelinka, I think he can be a very good
GM all around. But Magic was going to be a problem, he pulled a fast one on
Jeanie.
Tempy LNS HOF SilverPosts: 13422Location: El Pueblo de la Reina de Los Angeles votes: 52
01/30/2018 - 02:22 PM
TimmyDoe wrote:
I’ve said in another thread that I don’t mind Pelinka, I think he can be
a very good GM all around. But Magic was going to be a problem, he pulled a fast one on
Jeanie.
Not letting Jerry West come back was in my option was a bad move he is the deal
maker.
JJCali LNS HOF BronzePosts: 8550votes: 22
01/30/2018 - 07:54 PM
Magic is the one that scares me. I believe he's the star chaser, the LBJ chaser. Pelinka may
not be all in on that, like maybe not accepting bad trades of Clarkson/Randle???
Maybe Magic is mad about that. Who knows.
As far as him not being there every day... I don't care about that at all. That's the GM's
job.
kkennon1 LNS HOF SilverPosts: 14635Location: Phoenix, AZ votes: 24
01/30/2018 - 08:50 PM
Not saying it's not true, but I'll believe it when I hear reports from a reporter closer
to Lakers organization.
Shepherd Posts: 13242votes: 59
01/31/2018 - 12:09 AM
Who knows, but certainly sounds plausible. Also on Jeanie's part not knowing what
she's doing. Agreed they should have brought back West, and he was willing. Would
have worked with his son, passed the torch. Best move for sure, that didn't happen.
It's always name recognition in this town. And Magic's name around LA
is...well...magic. He can do no wrong.
Not saying it's not true, but I'll believe it when I hear reports from a reporter
closer to Lakers organization.
Same here
MAGICLAKEZ LNS HOF GoldPosts: 19919Location: Los Angeles, California votes: 77
01/31/2018 - 04:50 AM
I'm not necessarily a huge supporter of Magic as the president of lakers BB operations.
I am slightly circumspect about his bb decision making abilities, considering his
much heralded accomplishments as the lakers head coach.
However with that being said, I will not write him off completely, until he he has had some
significant time under his belt. Fugg all these east coast biased loudmouths!!!
They never publish any good vibes surrounding the lakers. They do however, swoop
like vultures when the chips are down. We don’t need any outside noise right
now, the boys appear to be turning the corner.
ralppcobarde LNS HOF BronzePosts: 6566votes: 31
01/31/2018 - 05:50 AM
Fully agree with Magiclakez, too many outside noise.
Not saying it's not true, but I'll believe it when I hear reports from a reporter
closer to Lakers organization.
Yep me too.
Ray Die-Hard Laker FanPosts: 1977Location: RayJoined: 10/06/2012votes: 26
01/31/2018 - 12:36 PM
I'm so confused with what our current front office has done so badly up to this point? One
move that could be questionable is the Russell trade. And from what I heard is the
first route on that deal was to get try and get a top 10 pick for Russell not package
with him to move Mozgof. However they took what we needed and what we could actually
get for him. Moving Russell can be questioned, but it's ignorance if someone simply
says that was a horrible move made by our front office. Maybe there is a reason why the
rest of the league wouldn't give us much more. I'm sure Rob and Magic offered him up to
every team that had any interest. You just have to assume we got the best we could for
him.
In regards to people bashing on them because of this big plan to get 2 MAX guys this
summer, what's wrong with making that a goal? Up to this point, have they made a move
that hurt us now only to make the chances of getting those 2 guy this summer? Not that
I'm aware of. Sure we moved Russell, but I think that was more FO didn't like his fit as
a player on the our team then anything. I like I said there was reports that we were
originally trying to get a top 10 pick for him before we tagged Mozgof on his
deal.
Have we missed out on any FA that wanted to come here, because were are trying to stay
flexible this upcoming summer? Have we shipped out any other young talent, before
we have been ensure that we even need the cap space this summer, not that I'm aware
of.
In my eyes FO is doing great, we are in a great position to make a big move if everything
falls in place this summer. But guess what, if it doesn't then we can continue on with
the track we started this year. How is this not a win / win situation for us. So many
rumors about us putting people on the blocks, in reality 90% of this league is put on
the block if the right deal comes along. Putting players on the block and listening
to deals is part of being a good GM.
Tempy LNS HOF SilverPosts: 13422Location: El Pueblo de la Reina de Los Angeles Joined: 07/12/2008votes: 52
01/31/2018 - 01:14 PM
Ray wrote:
I'm so confused with what our current front office has done so badly up to this point?
One move that could be questionable is the Russell trade. And from what I heard is the
first route on that deal was to get try and get a top 10 pick
In regards to people bashing on them because of this big plan to get 2 MAX guys this
summer, what's wrong with making that a goal? Up to this point, have they made a move
that hurt us now only to make the chances of getting those 2 guy this summer? Not that
I'm aware of. Sure we moved Russell, but I think that was more FO didn't like his fit as
a player on the our team then anything. I like I said there was reports that we were
originally trying to get a top 10 pick for him before we tagged Mozgof on his
deal.
Have we missed out on any FA that wanted to come here, because were are trying to stay
flexible this upcoming summer? Have we shipped out any other young talent, before
we have been ensure that we even need the cap space this summer, not that I'm aware
of.
In my eyes FO is doing great, we are in a great position to make a big move if everything
falls in place this summer. But guess what, if it doesn't then we can continue on with
the track we started this year. How is this not a win / win situation for us. So many
rumors about us putting people on the blocks, in reality 90% of this league is put on
the block if the right deal comes along. Putting players on the block and listening
to deals is part of being a good GM.
As a counter to that, what have they done badly?
They created a poor atmosphere for the players. Not even entertaining a contract
extension for Randle. Openly making it known players are not required, Clarkson,
Nance etc. None of that is good for morale, or even good for a coach. Pretty hard to buy
in to a teams philosophies if you know your not going to be part of the team much
longer.
In the summer, if I was Randle, I'd be signing the first acceptable offer sheet that
came my way. What is plan B for the Lakers if they strike out on the top
stars?
So there isn't much to hate (although I didn't like the Russell trade personally),
there isn't much to like either. If they don't hit any top free agents, the roster is
no further forward than last summer, if your not improving you are standing still,
especially in the NBA.
Ray Die-Hard Laker FanPosts: 1977Location: RayJoined: 10/06/2012votes: 26
01/31/2018 - 02:27 PM
Players are foolish to think they are untrade-able if you are on a bad team. Man up and
play your game and make them not want to trade you. Rumors are like wild fire, for all
we know teams came to us asking for a player and since our FO listened, we are now
automatically shopping this said player. Also we don't even know about Randle
extension talks, we know a player's Agent wants to get the most money for their guys,
so maybe that Agent said we want 20 million a year, then of course why would the Lakers
listen to that if they feel nobody else will give it to Randle. That's the whole
purpose of Restricted FA we have the luxury to wait this out, that's what Randle
signed up for when he signed his rookie deal. Not sure I have heard Smart talk much
about not getting extension talks, but it did not affect his game. That's something
Randle needs to learn.
I don't feel bad for any millionaire player and the situation of their job they
signed up for.
As for if they don't get any FA this summer then its another year under the belt for our
young guys to get better. It's not like our FO has turned down some legit FA that
wanted to come here, but we said no because we are only waiting for 2 max guys and
that's all. For example: I don't remember Heyward saying I would like to play for
Lakers, and we simply decied to say no because we are saving our cap for Lebron /PG13.
Our FO have not passed up on signing any #1 or #2 type players, that wanted to come
here. Our FO hasn't really had a chance to
pull....
Tempy LNS HOF SilverPosts: 13422Location: El Pueblo de la Reina de Los Angeles votes: 52
01/31/2018 - 02:44 PM
The roster has so many holes. Hoarding cap space doesn't fix those holes. Once the
Lakers traded Russell and let Young go, it was clear that the roster needed 3 point
shooting.
The cap space is only worthwhile having if they actually sign anybody, in the summer we
will see if they do or not. Hoarding the cap space for another summer will be gross
negligence. The roster needs pieces and needs to be built. Start
building.
Top free agents are not going to be interested in joining a team that is not on the verge of
contending. There will probably never be another Heatles ever again in the NBA so
why are the FO hoping they can achieve something like that. It's not a solid plan,
it's a plan built on hope.
Ray Die-Hard Laker FanPosts: 1977Location: RayJoined: 10/06/2012votes: 26
01/31/2018 - 03:07 PM
Tempy wrote:
The roster has so many holes. Hoarding cap space doesn't fix those holes. Once the
Lakers traded Russell and let Young go, it was clear that the roster needed 3 point
shooting.
The cap space is only worthwhile having if they actually sign anybody, in the summer we
will see if they do or not. Hoarding the cap space for another summer will be gross
negligence. The roster needs pieces and needs to be built. Start
building.
Top free agents are not going to be interested in joining a team that is not on the verge of
contending. There will probably never be another Heatles ever again in the NBA so
why are the FO hoping they can achieve something like that. It's not a solid plan,
it's a plan built on hope.
Could you tell me which FA we missed out on this summer that paid us any attention in signing
with us, if you think we are simply hoarding it and not paying any attention to any FA
except Lebron / PG13/ Counsins.
kkennon1 LNS HOF SilverPosts: 14635Location: Phoenix, AZ Joined: 12/31/2013votes: 24
01/31/2018 - 04:39 PM
Saw this from Ramona:
Report: Lakers have had first-round picks offered for Clarkson, Randle
It’s been no secret that the top priority for the Los Angeles Lakers since
the Timofey Mozgov trade has been shedding more contracts to make
room for two max contracts. The front office has made it abundantly clear the plans
for the future.
The natural players that have stuck out have been Jordan Clarkson and Julius
Randle. The former is on a contract that runs through 2019-20 while the latter is due
for a new contract this summer.
While both have had their names tossed about in trade discussions,
ESPN’s Ramona Shelburne offered
some....
Tempy LNS HOF SilverPosts: 13422Location: El Pueblo de la Reina de Los Angeles votes: 52
01/31/2018 - 04:54 PM
Ray wrote:
Could you tell me which FA we missed out on this summer that paid us any attention in
signing with us, if you think we are simply hoarding it and not paying any attention
to any FA except Lebron / PG13/ Counsins.
You misunderstood what I was saying.
I'm saying if they miss out on free agents this summer, hoarding the cap space again for
the year after is a big mistake.
Ray Die-Hard Laker FanPosts: 1977Location: Rayvotes: 26
01/31/2018 - 05:02 PM
Tempy wrote:
You misunderstood what I was saying.
I'm saying if they miss out on free agents this summer, hoarding the cap space again for
the year after is a big mistake.
I agree we should not hold onto 70million cap space for summer 2019. If we miss on 2
star, which is likely. I would like to see us maybe get one that will help recruit the
following summer.
(I think like a month ago FO mentioned we may only get one guy this year and one next
year)
And
If we miss and don't get any max FA this summer then we should fill all of our holes and
keep flexibility to make room for 1 max player via trade or summer
2019.
I think Magic and Rob already know who’s coming through back channels.
Yeah, they're getting nobody. That's why Magic and Pelnka have been backtracking on the 2
major free agent talk lately. Talking about, "we might not use that cap
space" or "we might use it to re-sign our own players." They're
trying to get people ready for when they strike out in July. lmao.
BaadMaster LNS HOF BronzePosts: 8876votes: 103
01/31/2018 - 07:24 PM
TERRY-TEAGLE wrote:
I think Magic and Rob already know who’s coming through back channels.
One thing is for sure: we don't have to worry about PG and/or LeBron signing with the now
star-less Clippers. If either or both want L.A. it's the Lakers or
nothing.
kkennon1 LNS HOF SilverPosts: 14635Location: Phoenix, AZ votes: 24
01/31/2018 - 07:50 PM
BaadMaster wrote:
One thing is for sure: we don't have to worry about PG and/or LeBron signing with the
now star-less Clippers. If either or both want L.A. it's the Lakers or nothing.
Don't know about that! If they can bring back DJ, Lou or Bradley. And Tobias Harris is very
good player, was hoping Lakers would sign him a few years back.
Yeah, they're getting nobody. That's why Magic and Pelnka have been backtracking
on the 2 major free agent talk lately. Talking about, "we might not use that cap
space" or "we might use it to re-sign our own players." They're
trying to get people ready for when they strike out in July. lmao.
And I’m cool with that as well. I just think they have an idea on who’s
coming and not coming already .