My Opinions: When I look at your banners / logos. I compare it to the original and see
if I would rather keep the current logo or see if its just a side-step in replace logos
or if it should replace the original. I also try to picture how the banner would look
on the website and see if it matches. I also look at it from the attraction point of
view. Because if logos and banners are supposed to attract viewers, does it do it's
job?
Magic Mamba: I think its a little too basic with just a picture and text. Maybe a
little more photoshop.
six.chris: It's a nice concept but, to me, it's not meshing well together. Its a
little bit of the font selection, little bit of the consistency of picture quality.
Some pics are good quality (Kobe), while Magic looks different. And then,
"Lakers...where life happens" didn't really sound right to me. Good
job. As for the Logo, I think the logo could be more exclusive to Lakers Topbuzz.
Because a basketball with Lakers Topbuzz on it, any lakers discussion site could do
that. I just think it would be more special if there was more freshness to it.
El Honcho: Nice, I like yours. Banner that is lol. Nice and simple having the same
qualities of the original banner with a little spice to it. The banner is nice and
loud shouting "who we are and what we do" in it. So if some surfer had a
second to spare and liked what it saw, it would click on the banner and enter the
website. Because many surfers won't look at banners for a long time, it needs that
quick attraction....