(Official) 2008 NBA Finals: LA Lakers vs. Boston Celtics
Lakers Forum » Super Laker Fan Forum (Veteran Members Only)My question to you all:
Would you rather rather play this series 2-3-2 or 2-2-1-1???
This will be a hard fought battle in order for us to try and win the finals, really hard fought. The Celtics are hungry, and on top of that Paul is playing home games in Boston and LA, which is always a concern for me.
I love the matchup. The two best in the NBA, cant ask for anything better!! I really dont like the 2-3-2 schedule, but I think we can play through it. We have been the best road team in the playoffs by far. Cant wait!! GO LAKERS.
lol. Wow.
ESPN keeps bringing back how Kobe wanted a trade before the season. They even brought back a small track of him sayin that.
im so excited this will be my 1st lakers vs celtics finals!
p.s. i love the short short picture on SI
I prefer the 2-3-2 compared to the 2-2-1-1 .
If we're able to split the first two games, then we have such an advantage. Considering the Celtics have played bad on the road the entire playoffs (that win over the Pistons was lucky) and we haven't lost at all at home, we could win it in 5.
If we win the first two games, we could afford to lose one game at home.
But this is the Finals, Kobe is hungry. Not to mention KG, RayRay and the Truth. Anything can happen. Realistacally speaking, this will go all the way to a decisive Game 7.
So either way, we'll still be at the Garden in a game 7.
A 2-3-2 is better, because we can take advantage of having 3 straight home games.
Remember Dallas? They were up 2-0 and Miami went on to win 4 straight..
This will be a great series to watch. Good luck to both teams.. But the Lakers are WINNING, baby!!
GO LAKERS!!!!!
(f*** those leprechauns up!)
Well, here's the schedule:
2-3-2 is better because the 3 straight home games.
We need to steal one game at boston and win 3 straight home games.
