Magic and Pelinka Make Their First Move and I Hate It. (P. 3)

Lakers Forum » Lakers Blogs
Author Search This Topic:
 
LakersLyfe
votes: 1
NewsSurge Newbie
Posts: 13

Probably not "the savior" but definitely helps our wins, our brand and improves our chances of getting other talent onto the team in the future.

We've got to start somewhere and I think Paul George, in his prime, is a great foundation.

Beating GSW? Unfortunately, no way. But I never understood that perspective....if we can't beat the best team in the league (that has 4 all stars two of which are superstars) then why even bother?

I hear a lot fans looking at it from that perspective, but I don't quite get why.

IMO, we keep getting as good as we can to get as deep into the playoffs as we can.

The goal is of course to win a chip but is Golden State so good that we should just stay dormant for a few years until they get old or or disband?

Look, we've been terrible for a few years, improvement comes incrementally.

I know we as Lakers fans want a championship or bust, but we're nowhere near that and I think at this point, we should be happy with steady, constant improvements.

MontanewKB24
votes: 2
Serious Laker Fan
Posts: 241
TimmyDoe wrote:
Do you expect that Paul George is the saviour who will take us from 20 wins to 60+? Say we pick him up (which is inevitable at this point), we pick up a couple of good players off FA, none of which who are LBJ (GSW will still kick our asses with LBJ), are we winning a championship during GSW's prime? Seems like some Laker fans have the same vision as Magic, chase stars cause basketball is all about the stars. We want championships. First or second round exits aren't our thing, we're the damn Lakers, not those filthy Clips
The....

TimmyDoe
votes: 22
Die-Hard Laker Fan
Posts: 1580

Paul George is not a superstar, I don't care what anyone says. Two way player yes, not the face of a franchise who can carry a team from nothing to something. In 4 years he will be 31. LeBron will be 36. IMO we would have been better off investing in the future. You can't tell me a lineup of Ball/Russell/Ingram/Randle-Nance/Zubac doesn't look scary especially when they develop. I said in another thread that we have a lowkey stacked team. We don't have the pretty names that the Sixers or the Wolves have, but this team wouldve been right up there with them, maybe better than them even.

But when we throw away the young piece, while controversial, is the most likely to be a star on our team, for CAP ROOM for a CHANCE to sign free agents? It is one thing to get good players now to try to develop but somewhat compete (something that Busschak tried to do with Mozzy and Deng). It's a whole other thing when you clearly don't care for the future and just want to chase stars NOW when it's so damn obvious it isn't going to happen. I completely understand what you were saying when you want to get better little by little, but Magic doesn't seem to indicate that that's what his aim is. He wants to snap and have #17 at the Lakers facility. Ffs he tried to trade Pick 2 away for 5 and 10 so he could give one of those to the Pacers on top of Randle/JC, 27, AND 28.

I love Paul George, everything about him is what I want in a basketball player asides from his jumpshot happy scoring. But he isn't what the Lakers needed. Magic is taking a hard pass on our future when that is where our best chance to win is.

TERRY-TEAGLE
votes: 41
Laker GM
Posts: 3664
Location: Belmont Shores,CA

kkennon1
votes: 23
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 14351
Location: Phoenix, AZ
us.gif

TimmyDoe wrote:
Paul George is not a superstar, I don't care what anyone says. Two way player yes, not the face of a franchise who can carry a team from nothing to something. In 4 years he will be 31. LeBron will be 36. IMO we would have been better off investing in the future. You can't tell me a lineup of Ball/Russell/Ingram/Randle-Nance/Zubac doesn't look scary especially when they develop. I said in another thread that we have a lowkey stacked team. We don't have the pretty names that the Sixers or the Wolves have, but this team wouldve been right up there with them, maybe better than them even.

But when we throw away the young piece, while controversial, is the most likely to be a star on our team, for CAP ROOM for a CHANCE to sign free agents? It is one thing to get good players now to try to develop but somewhat compete (something that Busschak tried to do with Mozzy and Deng). It's a whole other thing when you clearly don't care for the future and just want to chase stars NOW when it's so damn obvious it isn't going to happen. I completely understand what you were saying when you want to get better little by little, but Magic doesn't seem to indicate that that's what his aim is. He wants to snap and have #17 at the Lakers facility. Ffs he tried to trade Pick 2 away for 5 and 10 so he could give one of those to the Pacers on top of Randle/JC, 27, AND 28.

I love Paul George, everything about him is what I want in a basketball player asides from his jumpshot happy scoring. But he isn't what the Lakers needed

Agree and disagree,as far as how good they will be, and how good they are compared to other teams. Do you think if it had been Towns, Wiggins, Greek freak, Simmons, Embiid ( healthy or not) on Lakers team, they would be on Nets right now? Very Doubtful.

OCLakerfan8
votes: 20
Laker GM
Posts: 2896

LakersLyfe wrote:
Probably not "the savior" but definitely helps our wins, our brand and improves our chances of getting other talent onto the team in the future.

We've got to start somewhere and I think Paul George, in his prime, is a great foundation.

Beating GSW? Unfortunately, no way. But I never understood that perspective....if we can't beat the best team in the league (that has 4 all stars two of which are superstars) then why even bother?

I hear a lot fans looking at it from that perspective, but I don't quite get why.

IMO, we keep getting as good as we can to get as deep into the playoffs as we can.

The goal is of course to win a chip but is Golden State so good that we should just stay dormant for a few years until they get old or or disband?

Look, we've been terrible for a few years, improvement comes incrementally.

I know we as Lakers fans want a championship or bust, but we're nowhere near that and I think at this point, we should be happy with steady, constant improvements.

I have to agree with Lakerlyfe with this.

I liked D'Angelo and would have rather waitied until Trade deadline to see how a Ball/Russell backcourt would have worked out before making a trade but I don't think this is a terrible trade that jeopardizes our future or whatever. We still have Ingram, Ball or whoever we pick with the 2nd, Clarkson, Julius, Nance Jr. and Zubacs for much needed youth. Mixing them with vets like PG13 and maybe Lebron or Westbrook would be the best shot at Becoming a contender again.

MAGICLAKEZ
votes: 70
LNS HOF Gold
Posts: 16773
Location: Los Angeles, California
us.gif

kkennon1 wrote:
Agree and disagree,as far as how good they will be, and how good they are compared to other teams. Do you think if it had been Towns, Wiggins, Greek freak, Simmons, Embiid ( healthy or not) on Lakers team, they would be on Nets right now? Very Doubtful.

Yeah but we need to make most of what we have. Can't go around salivating and drawing comparisons with what others have.

Kk you always like to eye the neighbor's possessions...I really hope your neighbor's wife is not a supermodel. ROFL!!!!!

kkennon1
votes: 23
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 14351
Location: Phoenix, AZ
us.gif

MAGICLAKEZ wrote:
Yeah but we need to make most of what we have. Can't go around salivating and drawing comparisons with what others have.

Kk you always like to eye the neighbor's possessions...I really hope your neighbor's wife is not a supermodel. ROFL!!!!!

Yeah, people keep comparing, I'm just answering honestly. Have no problem with who Lakers have picked in draft, think at time , they were best available ( maybe except Porzingis, but who knew he'd be what he is). But get tried of some saying that core is better than this teams ,when clearly if Lakers had, had a chance at Towns, Wiggins, probably even Embiid, they wouldn't have taken them over what we have.

No some are upset about Dlo, but think his immaturity and Lakers possibly drafting Ball, got him traded. He was the next best talent behind Ingram, 2nd pick and had the value to get deal done. I don't like it, but I understand it. And I know you think I wanted him traded, but nothing could be farther from the truth, He just pissed me off last 2 years because I knew he was better than what he was showing on the court. But think getting traded will be a good than for him, might put a chip on his shoulder and we might get to see the real Dlo.

MAGICLAKEZ
votes: 70
LNS HOF Gold
Posts: 16773
Location: Los Angeles, California
us.gif

kkennon1 wrote:
Yeah, people keep comparing, I'm just answering honestly. Have no problem with who Lakers have picked in draft, think at time , they were best available ( maybe except Porzingis, but who knew he'd be what he is). But get tried of some saying that core is better than this teams ,when clearly if Lakers had, had a chance at Towns, Wiggins, probably even Embiid, they wouldn't have taken them over what we have.

No some are upset about Dlo, but think his immaturity and Lakers possibly drafting Ball, got him traded. He was the next best talent behind Ingram, 2nd pick and had the value to get deal done. I don't like it, but I understand it. And I know you think I wanted him traded, but nothing could be farther from the truth, He just pissed me off last 2 years because I knew he was better than what he was showing on the court. But think getting traded will be a good than for him, might put a chip on his shoulder and we might get to see the real Dlo.

And trade for him when he shines. Lol

JJCali
votes: 22
LNS HOF Bronze
Posts: 8544

us.gif

kkennon1 wrote:
Just because you drafted in too of draft doesn't mean they'll turn into stars. Matter of fact, very few have , percentage wise. So are you going to keep being bad until you get lucky and draft a star, or try to sign a star or 2 to go with your good roll players?

Of course they don't all turn into stars, but if you miss in 4 straight years then you suck at drafting.

LALayup
votes: 125
LNS HOF Silver

Posts: 13693
Location: RRTX

Definitely hard to like the trade, but it's obvious that it's mostly about clearing massive salary room for future deals. It's the Lakers way...going for big fish instead of minnows. At this point, I can only hope it works. Ball had better be good. Very good.

thatguyoverthere
votes: 13
Die-Hard Laker Fan
Posts: 1939

Magic and Pelinka have started the timer of public opinion by effectively trading D'Angelo Russell and Timofey Mozgov for Brook Lopez and Kyle Kuzma. If they end up letting Lopez go for cap space without getting something in return for him, I will be pissed.

Nay511
votes: 11
Die-Hard Laker Fan
Posts: 2205

us.gif

I didn't like when the Laker management traded away Nick Van Exel and Eddie Jones but they had to be traded away so that Kobe could grow and shine and look how Kobe''s career turned out. DAngeIo got the Van Exel treatment. But let's hope Clarkson doesn't get traded.

kkennon1
votes: 23
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 14351
Location: Phoenix, AZ
us.gif

LALayup wrote:
Definitely hard to like the trade, but it's obvious that it's mostly about clearing massive salary room for future deals. It's the Lakers way...going for big fish instead of minnows. At this point, I can only hope it works. Ball had better be good. Very good.

I'd be surprised if he looks as good as he's possibly going to be 1st year. Everybody in league will becoming after him.

TimmyDoe
votes: 22
Die-Hard Laker Fan
Posts: 1580

Nay511 wrote:
I didn't like when the Laker management traded away Nick Van Exel and Eddie Jones but they had to be traded away so that Kobe could grow and shine and look how Kobe''s career turned out. DAngeIo got the Van Exel treatment. But let's hope Clarkson doesn't get traded.

D'Angelo didn't get traded so that anyone could grow. He got traded so we could have a chance to sign max money FA's. If anyone was gonna get to Van Exel treatment, or the Monta Ellis treatment, it would have been JC before Luke put him on the bench where he should be. JC is a stud off the bench, but IMO not good enough to be a starter until his IQ improves and becomes less of a black hole.

Tempy
votes: 51
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 12890
Location: El Pueblo de la Reina de Los Angeles
calif.gif

OCLakerfan8 wrote:
I have to agree with Lakerlyfe with this.

I liked D'Angelo and would have rather waitied until Trade deadline to see how a Ball/Russell backcourt would have worked out before making a trade but I don't think this is a terrible trade that jeopardizes our future or whatever. We still have Ingram, Ball or whoever we pick with the 2nd, Clarkson, Julius, Nance Jr. and Zubacs for much needed youth. Mixing them with vets like PG13 and maybe Lebron or Westbrook would be the best shot at Becoming a contender again.

You also said Mozgov was a good signing......

OCLakerfan8
votes: 20
Laker GM
Posts: 2896

Tempy wrote:
You also said Mozgov was a good signing......

Considering what we had to work with at that time I still think it was the best we would have gotten.

You though these lottery picks were going to be our saviors. Here we are four lottery picks later. Say we kept D'Lo.... Never mind competing for the championships, do you really think we're making the playoffs with Lonzo, D' Lo, and Ingram as our core anytime soon?

TERRY-TEAGLE
votes: 41
Laker GM
Posts: 3664
Location: Belmont Shores,CA

JJCali wrote:
Of course they don't all turn into stars, but if you miss in 4 straight years then you suck at drafting.

I didn't know Rob and Magic drafted 4 years in a row. I thought this was their first year at the helm .

JJ, your sounding like some Dodger fans I know who blame the roster on Friedman right when he got here. Not even giving the guy a chance to prove himself, shed terrible contracts, draft his own guys and build the team they way he wants to.

You're already blaming Magic for the Roster we have and the players that were recently drafted / signed by someone else .

JJCali
votes: 22
LNS HOF Bronze
Posts: 8544

us.gif

TERRY-TEAGLE wrote:
I didn't know Rob and Magic drafted 4 years in a row. I thought this was their first year at the helm .

JJ, your sounding like some Dodger fans I know who blame the roster on Friedman right when he got here. Not even giving the guy a chance to prove himself, shed terrible contracts, draft his own guys and build the team they way he wants to.

You're already blaming Magic for the Roster we have and the players that were recently drafted / signed by someone else .

Interesting. Considering I didn't say anything about either of them. We were discussing the players and their potential to prosper. Don't know how you are going to tell me who I'm blaming when I didn't blame anyone for anything. You're literally just putting your own words in my mouth. The only thing I blame Magic for is the 2 stupid trades he's done so far. Although I am calming down now that we haven't made it worse by trading even more for George... so far anyways.

MAGICLAKEZ
votes: 70
LNS HOF Gold
Posts: 16773
Location: Los Angeles, California
us.gif

Tempy wrote:
You also said Mozgov was a good signing......

Lmao!!!! Yep.

MAGICLAKEZ
votes: 70
LNS HOF Gold
Posts: 16773
Location: Los Angeles, California
us.gif

OCLakerfan8 wrote:

You though these lottery picks were going to be our saviors. Here we are four lottery picks later. Say we kept D'Lo.... Never mind competing for the championships, do you really think we're making the playoffs with Lonzo, D' Lo, and Ingram as our core anytime soon?

So Now we have Lonzo, Ingram, Kuzma and Lopez as the core. What changed?

Or are you suggesting that Kuzma and Lopez are the saviors? I don't see PG on the roster.

Clearing cap with nothing to show for it? Clear cap space by all means, but then show what you did with the cleared space.

Tomorrow we will see Ingram being used to dump Deng. We as fans should accept that. Ingram had a far inferior rookie season compared to Dlo's rookie season on both ends of the floor. It should be a no brainer then. I mean we need to create additional cap space for another all star and this should be next the logical step.

Tempy
votes: 51
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 12890
Location: El Pueblo de la Reina de Los Angeles
calif.gif

OCLakerfan8 wrote:
Considering what we had to work with at that time I still think it was the best we would have gotten.

You though these lottery picks were going to be our saviors. Here we are four lottery picks later. Say we kept D'Lo.... Never mind competing for the championships, do you really think we're making the playoffs with Lonzo, D' Lo, and Ingram as our core anytime soon?

I would love for you to quote me where I said they were going to be the Lakers savior. We both know I've never said such a thing.

What I have said is that they were the foundation of the rebuild, and that no team can purely rebuild through the draft. It takes the draft, free agency and smart trades and a lot of patience to rebuild.

Mozgov was a terrible signing at that price point, trading Russell away just to get rid of that contract was equally as bad. The team wasn't going anywhere this season anyway so what was the rush to dump him?

kkennon1
votes: 23
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 14351
Location: Phoenix, AZ
us.gif

Tempy wrote:
I would love for you to quote me where I said they were going to be the Lakers savior. We both know I've never said such a thing.

What I have said is that they were the foundation of the rebuild, and that no team can purely rebuild through the draft. It takes the draft, free agency and smart trades and a lot of patience to rebuild.

Mozgov was a terrible signing at that price point, trading Russell away just to get rid of that contract was equally as bad. The team wasn't going anywhere this season anyway so what was the rush to dump him?

http://teamstre.am/2rZT90v

kkennon1
votes: 23
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 14351
Location: Phoenix, AZ
us.gif

MAGICLAKEZ wrote:
So Now we have Lonzo, Ingram, Kuzma and Lopez as the core. What changed?

Or are you suggesting that Kuzma and Lopez are the saviors? I don't see PG on the roster.

Clearing cap with nothing to show for it? Clear cap space by all means, but then show what you did with the cleared space.

Tomorrow we will see Ingram being used to dump Deng. We as fans should accept that. Ingram had a far inferior rookie season compared to Dlo's rookie season on both ends of the floor. It should be a no brainer then. I mean we need to create additional cap space for another all star and this should be next the logical step.

That's not true , Ingram was better on defensive end. And do you honestly think Dlo is going to be a better all-around player than Ingram?

Tempy
votes: 51
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 12890
Location: El Pueblo de la Reina de Los Angeles
calif.gif

kkennon1 wrote:
http://teamstre.am/2rZT90v

Ok let's look at some of the facts here.

Lopez is not an all star caliber center. He has been an all star once, back in 2013. This is the same line everyone was fooled with when the previous FO signed Hibbert.

Sure he put up 20.5 points and 5.4 rebounds a game, as the #1 option (29.2% usage rate) on the worst team in the league which got them 20 wins. Are we supposed to be impressed with that?

Lopez is not the future at center for the franchise, so he is also taking away minutes from Zubac.

This move was a salary dump in the hope they can get a star free agent in 2018. Is signing Westbrook, LBJ, or cousins with PG13 really going to put the Lakers in contention? Because those are the best players that are going to be available.

MAGICLAKEZ
votes: 70
LNS HOF Gold
Posts: 16773
Location: Los Angeles, California
us.gif

kkennon1 wrote:
That's not true , Ingram was better on defensive end. And do you honestly think Dlo is going to be a better all-around player than Ingram?

What did you see from Ingram that makes you say that? I'm a huge Ingram guy but I didn't see anything on the court except in the last few games which instilled any hope/confidence. So we are betting on potential aren't we? Meaning if he stays the same way next season he should be gone just like Dlo, since we decided Dlo's fate in 2 seasons as well. Lmao!!

Your response?

kkennon1
votes: 23
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 14351
Location: Phoenix, AZ
us.gif
Tempy wrote:
Ok let's look at some of the facts here. Lopez is not an all star caliber center. He has been an all star once, back in 2013. This is the same line everyone was fooled with when the previous FO signed Hibbert. Sure he put up 20.5 points and 5.4 rebounds a game, as the #1 option (29.2% usage rate) on the worst team in the league which got them 20 wins. Are we supposed to be impressed with that? Lopez is not the future at center for the franchise, so he is also taking away minutes from Zubac. This move was a salary....

JJCali
votes: 22
LNS HOF Bronze
Posts: 8544

us.gif

Unless you're marrying him, how does one become Kobe in a bad way?

Tempy
votes: 51
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 12890
Location: El Pueblo de la Reina de Los Angeles
calif.gif

kkennon1 wrote:
I Don't know, it depends on how much young guys develop. Add 2 stars and get in playoffs, once there, anything can happen.

But fact remains that a talented player like Dlo didn't get traded for just a salary dump. There were real problem behind the scenes.

Sounds like Dlo was becoming Kobe 2.0, not in good way.

http://teamstre.am/2tCeBph

I take the news of him being a bad locker room presence etc being leaked after the trade as a lil suspicious. The trade didn't sit well with many fans, so leaking this kind of stuff to placate them is to be expected.

I'm not saying it's not possible but the timing of it all says everything.

kkennon1
votes: 23
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 14351
Location: Phoenix, AZ
us.gif

MAGICLAKEZ wrote:
What did you see from Ingram that makes you say that? I'm a huge Ingram guy but I didn't see anything on the court except in the last few games which instilled any hope/confidence. So we are betting on potential aren't we? Meaning if he stays the same way next season he should be gone just like Dlo, since we decided Dlo's fate in 2 seasons as well. Lmao!!

Your response?

My exceptation for Ingram coming in were 3 to 4 years, never thought he'd come in 1st year and light it up, said on here when he was drafted not to expect to much 1st few years. But Ingram is obviously not the distraction in locker room reports are saying Dlo was.

Do you really think Dlo is gone just for a salary dump??? You don't trade a player with that talent just to get cap space.

MAGICLAKEZ
votes: 70
LNS HOF Gold
Posts: 16773
Location: Los Angeles, California
us.gif
kkennon1 wrote:
My exceptation for Ingram coming in were 3 to 4 years, never thought he'd come in 1st year and light it up, said on here when he was drafted not to expect to much 1st few years. But Ingram is obviously not the distraction in locker room reports are saying Dlo was. Do you really think Dlo is gone just for a salary dump??? You don't trade a player with that talent just to get cap space.
A)You want to give Ingram 3-4 years and DLo 2? In which bb universe is that fair? B) Dlo is a distraction but I haven't....

TERRY-TEAGLE
votes: 41
Laker GM
Posts: 3664
Location: Belmont Shores,CA

D-Lo lovers

MAGICLAKEZ
votes: 70
LNS HOF Gold
Posts: 16773
Location: Los Angeles, California
us.gif

D- lo. Haters:

kkennon1
votes: 23
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 14351
Location: Phoenix, AZ
us.gif
MAGICLAKEZ wrote:
A)You want to give Ingram 3-4 years and DLo 2? In which bb universe is that fair? B) Dlo is a distraction but I haven't heard anything from the teammates or the FO. If he's a distraction come forward, show some Kahunas and say that was the case. I only hear fans making noise and making assumptions. How will they manage the innocent docile Cousins and LBJ, if they couldn't handle an eccentric 21 yr old? C) I'm all for clearing cap space but does that mean your most productive player becomes expendable? I mean Rob mentioned that there was nothing against Dlo's....

TERRY-TEAGLE
votes: 41
Laker GM
Posts: 3664
Location: Belmont Shores,CA

Hahahaha ... don't hate him. Like his offensive game .

But he does have flaws... he not very athletic and is very slow footed... not a good defensive player which hurt us a ton

People tend to look at offensive stats too much when judging a player. Also forget to look at the intangibles a player brings. D-Lo was missing a lot of those

Ok back to the back and forth

MAGICLAKEZ
votes: 70
LNS HOF Gold
Posts: 16773
Location: Los Angeles, California
us.gif

TERRY-TEAGLE wrote:
Hahahaha ... don't hate him. Like his offensive game .

But he does have flaws... he not very athletic and is very slow footed... not a good defensive player which hurt us a ton

People tend to look at offensive stats too much when judging a player. Also forget to look at the intangibles a player brings. D-Lo was missing a lot of those

Ok back to the back and forth

Lol. No I'm done. Just hope that this results in some major acquisitions otherwise the move was just a waste.

MAGICLAKEZ
votes: 70
LNS HOF Gold
Posts: 16773
Location: Los Angeles, California
us.gif

kkennon1 wrote:
I didn't give Dlo 2 years, FO did and have heard reports from reporters and analysis for last 2 years saying stuff about his work ethic and attitude. Also just read that Dlo wasn't 1st option to get rid of bad contract, they offered teams unprotected future 1st rd pick , before trade.

http://teamstre.am/2t3Ojzl

Do I wish he was still on team, YES!!! But he's not, so I'm moving on.

I'm moving on as well. No choice now. Lol. No use crying over spilt milk.

Just want to add that the 2 years of reports of his "alleged" bad attitude/ethics emanated from the previous coaching staff. This current regime only saw DLo after Jim/Kupchak got fired. Essentially 30 something games. They never got to see him for an entire season. Sad if they jumped to that conclusion based on second hand information.

JJCali
votes: 22
LNS HOF Bronze
Posts: 8544

us.gif

kkennon1 wrote:
My exceptation for Ingram coming in were 3 to 4 years, never thought he'd come in 1st year and light it up, said on here when he was drafted not to expect to much 1st few years. But Ingram is obviously not the distraction in locker room reports are saying Dlo was.

Do you really think Dlo is gone just for a salary dump??? You don't trade a player with that talent just to get cap space.

Agreed. Ingram was always viewed as a little bit of a project. Not as in skill but as physically.

kkennon1
votes: 23
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 14351
Location: Phoenix, AZ
us.gif

MAGICLAKEZ wrote:
I'm moving on as well. No choice now. Lol. No use crying over spilt milk.

Just want to add that the 2 years of reports of his "alleged" bad attitude/ethics emanated from the previous coaching staff. This current regime only saw DLo after Jim/Kupchak got fired. Essentially 30 something games. They never got to see him for an entire season. Sad if they jumped to that conclusion based on second hand information.

Think Magic's statement says it all, " needed a leader that other players wanted to play with".

Magiclakez, think that says a lot. If other players didn't really want to play with , for whatever reason. Than what else could they do?

Either way I'm sorry to see him go, but understand a little more now!!!

MAGICLAKEZ
votes: 70
LNS HOF Gold
Posts: 16773
Location: Los Angeles, California
us.gif

kkennon1 wrote:
Think Magic's statement says it all, " needed a leader that other players wanted to play with".

Magiclakez, think that says a lot. If other players didn't really want to play with , for whatever reason. Than what else could they do?

Either way I'm sorry to see him go, but understand a little more now!!! http://lakers.newssurge.com/PNphpBB2-viewtopic-t-52409-start-100.html# 971270]

https://twitter.com/notinbtnet/status/878381880948563968[/twe et]

Boom!!! Lol.

Fwiw: The team also got alienated when Magic signed a $25m deal spread over 25 years. Lmao!!!!!

PS: The parties were at the playboy mansion and was a major distraction for the teammates.

kkennon1
votes: 23
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 14351
Location: Phoenix, AZ
us.gif

MAGICLAKEZ wrote:

Boom!!! Lol.

Fwiw: The team also got alienated when Magic signed a $25m deal spread over 25 years. Lmao!!!!!

PS: The parties were at the playboy mansion and was a major distraction for the teammates.

So your saying Dlo will be a all time great. Saw the Lakers/ Celtics series on TV, Magic also so came back and won team over after coach firing , rest is history. Boom!!!! Lol

Point is team didn't see him fitting in anymore and that's all that really matters. Like I keep saying , they don't give a Damn what you or I think!!!!

MAGICLAKEZ
votes: 70
LNS HOF Gold
Posts: 16773
Location: Los Angeles, California
us.gif

kkennon1 wrote:
So your saying Dlo will be a all time great. Saw the Lakers/ Celtics series on TV, Magic also so came back and won team over after coach firing , rest is history. Boom!!!! Lol

Point is team didn't see him fitting in anymore and that's all that really matters. Like I keep saying , they don't give a Damn what you or I think!!!!

I don't know I never found out. He was banished after 2 seasons.

Magic was given a chance to win team over, Dlo wasn't

And you are right they don't give a damn about anything but still have their apologists in abundance.

kkennon1
votes: 23
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 14351
Location: Phoenix, AZ
us.gif

MAGICLAKEZ wrote:
I don't know I never found out. He was banished after 2 seasons.

Wow, now I see why your upset, you had Dlo on a lot higher ceiling than most. Have to be honest, If Dlo was going to be your best player on team, don't think that team is winning Sh!t...imo

Think people need to start reading between the lines. Magic said players could be gone without saying it. When he said, "Don't see any untouchables ".

MAGICLAKEZ
votes: 70
LNS HOF Gold
Posts: 16773
Location: Los Angeles, California
us.gif

kkennon1 wrote:
Wow, now I see why your upset, you had Dlo on a lot higher ceiling than most.

Think people need to start reading between the lines. Magic said players could be gone without saying it. When he said, "Don't see any untouchables ".

Here is where I agree with you. Nobody on the core is safe. I see more of them being moved pretty soon. Hope I'm wrong.

PS: yeah Dlo was the best out of the available sh!t.

kkennon1
votes: 23
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 14351
Location: Phoenix, AZ
us.gif

MAGICLAKEZ wrote:
Here is where I agree with you. Nobody on the core is safe. I see more of them being moved pretty soon. Hope I'm wrong.

Oh it's coming , I'm almost sure of that. Although I really doubt they move Ingram, but your probably right , no one is safe. Oh well !

Man I love sports, like a great reality show or some of my favorite TV series , excitement, action, heart break. But it's all just entertainment, at least that's how I've always seen it. Cast is always changing, characters come and go.

userpete1037
votes: 18
LNS HOF Platinum
Posts: 20263
Location: Kobe, Kalifornia
us.gif

C'mon Preseason!!!!!!!!!......lol. Can't wait to see this kid work his "Magic"....lmao.

MAGICLAKEZ
votes: 70
LNS HOF Gold
Posts: 16773
Location: Los Angeles, California
us.gif

userpete1037 wrote:
C'mon Preseason!!!!!!!!!......lol. Can't wait to see this kid work his "Magic"....lmao.

Preseason will be fun..but I'm waiting for this Lol.

userpete1037
votes: 18
LNS HOF Platinum
Posts: 20263
Location: Kobe, Kalifornia
us.gif

MAGICLAKEZ wrote:
Preseason will be fun..but I'm waiting for this Lol.

Holy Shyt!!!!!...lol. "Stay in Yo Lane"....lmao.

MAGICLAKEZ
votes: 70
LNS HOF Gold
Posts: 16773
Location: Los Angeles, California
us.gif

userpete1037 wrote:
Holy Shyt!!!!!...lol. "Stay in Yo Lane"....lmao.

Check this out!!!! Lmao!!!!

kkennon1
votes: 23
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 14351
Location: Phoenix, AZ
us.gif


Options Quick Reply: RE: Magic and Pelinka Make Their First Move and I Hate It.
register
You are an anonymous user- or .
Quote the last message
Attach signature (signatures can be changed in profile)
Notify me when a reply is posted
Don't Check Spelling
Note: Twitter & Youtube BBCODE Tags are no longer necessary. The system will automatically convert links to tweets & youtube videos.
   


   
   
register
You are an anonymous user- Register now or Log in Now!