Rumor: Jim Buss Fired! Jeanie "Cleaning House" (P. 5)

Lakers News Surge Forum/Message Board » Lakers Rumors
Post new topic Reply to topic
Author Search This Topic:
 
gemfow
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 12402
Location: Maryland
us.gif
votes: 181
TERRY-TEAGLE wrote:
Instead of trying to get the next KOBE... They should try to get the next K.Leonard... And the next great defensive big man Stop trying to be Jerry West ... Build a team like G-State... Youth , shooters, athletes , defense
Exactly! That's what's been frustrating. When Mitch was trying to bring together a big three in 2012, it's as if he didn't see what was happening before his eyes. The league was moving towards deep teams and ball movement. Miami was very fortunate that SA blew that game 6 but they came back the next season....


JJCali
LNS HOF Bronze
Posts: 8543

us.gif
votes: 22

IhatetheCeltics wrote:
I don't think Kupchak does that because he thinks that is the best way, I think he does that because he thinks that is what Laker fans will accept. Laker fans just aren't patient, the organization can't do what Boston is doing for example. I really feel Kupchak knows rebuilding is the right thing to do. The problem is you have big factions of Lakeland that won't accept rebuilding. Boston has no problem rebuilding because their fans understand it takes time. If the fans were more in line and understood this, I don't think the organization would have any problem taking the longer route.

I don't think that really matters. The guy has a job to do and he better do his best at it. Not be stupid because some percentage of fans are impatient or stupid.


JJCali
LNS HOF Bronze
Posts: 8543

us.gif
votes: 22

kerby720 wrote:
Yeah, don't get me wrong, I'd love to be able to sign a superstar. Though, it depends on who it is. However, what many fans (and possibly the FO) don't understand is, we need to build a good young core first. If we get lucky enough to land Simmons/Ingram to go along with Russell, Clarkson, Randle, Nance Jr., Black, and Brown, I think that'd be a great start to building our team the right way. Let those young guys develop together. Then maybe we can sign a superstar.

I mean who knows, if those guys can build a chemistry together and really develop, maybe a superstar or two will emerge. We might not need to sign one if that happens.

I'm not totally following this superstar dilemma? At least 2 of those guys you named will be superstars. People are making it sound like its bad to have a superstar. I'm confused. If a superstar fills a need, you absolutely should sign or draft him. Heck, other people will say you draft the best available regardless of need, to go after the superstar. I'm more of a fill needs and build a complete team type of guy, but hell yes I want a superstar or two to fill those needs.


JJCali
LNS HOF Bronze
Posts: 8543

us.gif
votes: 22

gemfow wrote:
If that's the case then Kupchak shouldn't be the GM. I used to think that same way, he is just trying to appease fans' impatience but us fans have seen him just wait it out while fans get furious. I don't know, you probably are right but what I have seen from him as a GM is punishable by being fired imo. If Mitch or any part of Lakers' management can't come out and say that things will take time and show some sort of progression with moves then they need to be gone. I fear that this management team would do almost anything to acquire a star or stars just to bypass the rebuilding process. Sadly, Kupchak was there after the retirement of Magic and Worthy and the subsequent rebuild. That rebuild in the 90's was through the draft and adding Shaq was the game changer. Shaq was attracted by our roster at that time of Nick Van Exel, Eddie Jones, Edlen Campbell, Cedric Ceballos and so on. The team needed a center and boy did we get one, a true star. Our current FO would probably trade these young guys to get someone.

I agree that if Kupchak appeased to the fans then he has no business being the GM. But I don't think he does that at. I think LA is what attracted Shaq though. The city, the endorsement deals, the rapping and acting. Just being a huge star and the weather and the money is what attracted Shaq. He would have stayed in Orlando if it was just about winning. They were young, perennial contenders at that point.


JJCali
LNS HOF Bronze
Posts: 8543

us.gif
votes: 22

gemfow wrote:
I'm actually irritated that our FO sells LA's fans short. Our fanbase will get behind a younbg developing squad just like they got behind that young squad in the 90's. Nick Van Exel, Eddie Jones, Cedric Ceballos, Elden Campbell, Anthony Peeler and crew really energized the city of LA after the retirement of Magic.

You're older than me, maybe I'm too young, but I don't remember anyone caring about the Lakers for those years prior to 96. Maybe it was an in LA vs outside of LA thing. But they seemed pretty irrelevant until 1996. Then they gained a huge fan base due to Shaq and an 18 year old winning the dunk contest.

But I do agree with you. The majority of fans want us to move forward with our young core of Russell, Clarkson, Randle & Nance. Especially the first three. Most of us don't want to see them get traded unless it's for something great. I'm all for sticking with them and just adding pieces around them. I'd love to get Whiteside and a defensive minded SF. Actually I'm really hoping Brown can become that SF.


JJCali
LNS HOF Bronze
Posts: 8543

us.gif
votes: 22

TERRY-TEAGLE wrote:
Instead of trying to get the next KOBE... They should try to get the next K.Leonard... And the next great defensive big man

Stop trying to be Jerry West ... Build a team like G-State... Youth , shooters, athletes , defense

You'd rather have the next Leonard than the next Kobe?

So if I offered you a rookie and said he'll be the second best player ever and win you multiple championships or you can have this other guy who will also be really good, an all-star type of player, but not as good as the first guy at really anything, you'd rather have the "other guy"??


userpete1037
LNS HOF Gold
Posts: 19935
Location: Kobe, Kalifornia
us.gif
votes: 18

gemfow wrote:
I'm actually irritated that our FO sells LA's fans short. Our fanbase will get behind a younbg developing squad just like they got behind that young squad in the 90's. Nick Van Exel, Eddie Jones, Cedric Ceballos, Elden Campbell, Anthony Peeler and crew really energized the city of LA after the retirement of Magic.

Yep I remember those days with "Nick the Quick". Could imagine what that team would've been like if they would've waited til PJ got there before breaking up that team. Of course I'm speaking of Shaq and Kobe being there as well. Lot of excitement, championships, ego and jealousy. But would've been great.


userpete1037
LNS HOF Gold
Posts: 19935
Location: Kobe, Kalifornia
us.gif
votes: 18

JJCali wrote:
You'd rather have the next Leonard than the next Kobe?

So if I offered you a rookie and said he'll be the second best player ever and win you multiple championships or you can have this other guy who will also be really good, an all-star type of player, but not as good as the first guy at really anything, you'd rather have the "other guy"??

Well I'll tell you like this, build the team with the young core but if we were to get another Kobe, I ain't passing on that, no way. But continue to build the young core and hopefully get some quality FA's to go along with it. If we are fortunate enough to get BS, then we probably will have the next Magic part II.


gemfow
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 12402
Location: Maryland
us.gif
votes: 181

JJCali wrote:
I agree that if Kupchak appeased to the fans then he has no business being the GM. But I don't think he does that at. I think LA is what attracted Shaq though. The city, the endorsement deals, the rapping and acting. Just being a huge star and the weather and the money is what attracted Shaq. He would have stayed in Orlando if it was just about winning. They were young, perennial contenders at that point.
You're right but Shaq had to be able to win as well. Leaving a winning situation in Orlando and coming to a team in LA that would lose would have been a huge PR hit for Shaq, especially since he already was taking several hits at that time for not taking basketball seriously since he was acting in terrible movies like Shazaam and Steele and rapping with a group called Fu Schnickens and so on. Shaq had to come to a team that was going to be able to win with him at the helm and not Penny getting so much attention like he was in Orlando. SO, I say you're right but that wasn't the main reason.


TERRY-TEAGLE
Laker GM
 Avatar
Posts: 3664
Location: Belmont Shores,CA
votes: 41

JJCali wrote:
You'd rather have the next Leonard than the next Kobe?

So if I offered you a rookie and said he'll be the second best player ever and win you multiple championships or you can have this other guy who will also be really good, an all-star type of player, but not as good as the first guy at really anything, you'd rather have the "other guy"??

There will not be another KOBE... And we didn't even know how good he would be .

But if you get good young talent , you might find something that can win games for you

Just like me and gem mentioned... Those Van Exel, Eddie Jones, Campbell, and Ceballos teams were fun to watch and were very competitive .

They had the forum rocking with exciting play... Just needed a solid coach to coach them up .

We can get that again with the right moves and not try to go for the homerun.

If you get talent you can Make that major move to get better. But today's basketball is not the early 90's ball.

Mitch is feeling the pressure and has for awhile, that's why he wants the quick fix.

Keep getting younger and stack chips


gemfow
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 12402
Location: Maryland
us.gif
votes: 181

JJCali wrote:
You're older than me, maybe I'm too young, but I don't remember anyone caring about the Lakers for those years prior to 96. Maybe it was an in LA vs outside of LA thing. But they seemed pretty irrelevant until 1996. Then they gained a huge fan base due to Shaq and an 18 year old winning the dunk contest.

But I do agree with you. The majority of fans want us to move forward with our young core of Russell, Clarkson, Randle & Nance. Especially the first three. Most of us don't want to see them get traded unless it's for something great. I'm all for sticking with them and just adding pieces around them. I'd love to get Whiteside and a defensive minded SF. Actually I'm really hoping Brown can become that SF.

LA was reenergized around 94 due to the trio of Eddie Jones, Nick Van Exel and Cedric Ceballos. There were plenty of tee-shirts, posters and so on in LA celebrating the nice young trio and the team that was an up and coming one in the league. The young team just couldn't beat San Antonio with David Robinson and Dennis Rodman. In 96 the city was on a whole different level because of the arrival of Shaq, the four-year dominating center who was young, dominant, charismatic and one of the league's superstars. The LA fanbase grew because of Shaq. Fans will follow superstars and then Kobe ascended to one of the league's superstars and the team started winning championships. Fans will follow players and a winning team in a heartbeat. That's why the fanbase grew, just like the fanbase was huge in the eighties with Showtime and it's superstars and championships. People will follow a winning team in a minute.


JJCali
LNS HOF Bronze
Posts: 8543

us.gif
votes: 22

userpete1037 wrote:
Well I'll tell you like this, build the team with the young core but if we were to get another Kobe, I ain't passing on that, no way. But continue to build the young core and hopefully get some quality FA's to go along with it. If we are fortunate enough to get BS, then we probably will have the next Magic part II.

I'm with you! I think you have 3 stars already (eventually) and one of them will be a superstar. Just my optimistic opinion.


JJCali
LNS HOF Bronze
Posts: 8543

us.gif
votes: 22

TERRY-TEAGLE wrote:
There will not be another KOBE... And we didn't even know how good he would be .

But if you get good young talent , you might find something that can win games for you

Just like me and gem mentioned... Those Van Exel, Eddie Jones, Campbell, and Ceballos teams were fun to watch and were very competitive .

They had the forum rocking with exciting play... Just needed a solid coach to coach them up .

We can get that again with the right moves and not try to go for the homerun.

If you get talent you can Make that major move to get better. But today's basketball is not the early 90's ball.

Mitch is feeling the pressure and has for awhile, that's why he wants the quick fix.

Keep getting younger and stack chips

I think the young group is the homerun. Especially if Simmons or Ingram were added.


JJCali
LNS HOF Bronze
Posts: 8543

us.gif
votes: 22

gemfow wrote:
LA was reenergized around 94 due to the trio of Eddie Jones, Nick Van Exel and Cedric Ceballos. There were plenty of tee-shirts, posters and so on in LA celebrating the nice young trio and the team that was an up and coming one in the league. The young team just couldn't beat San Antonio with David Robinson and Dennis Rodman. In 96 the city was on a whole different level because of the arrival of Shaq, the four-year dominating center who was young, dominant, charismatic and one of the league's superstars. The LA fanbase grew because of Shaq. Fans will follow superstars and then Kobe ascended to one of the league's superstars and the team started winning championships. Fans will follow players and a winning team in a heartbeat. That's why the fanbase grew, just like the fanbase was huge in the eighties with Showtime and it's superstars and championships. People will follow a winning team in a minute.

Yeah, of course. It was also probably bigger in the city like you said. I'm from Cen Cal and all I remember from then was the Suns, Rockets, Magic, Knicks, Sonics & Bulls being popular. It was all about Shaq, Hakeem & Barkley. I remember the Rockets being the most popular team at my school even in 96 after Shaq came. But that's when things really started changing, like you said.


kkennon1
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 14286
Location: Phoenix, AZ
us.gif
votes: 23
Didn't see this coming. Report: Phil Jackson could offer to coach Knicks' home games next season by�Chris Walder�Mar 14, 9:43 PM Stephen Dunn / Getty Images Sport / Getty The solution to a number of the�New York Knicks' problems may come in the form of team president Phil Jackson potentially returning to the sidelines as a head coach. "The Zen Master" could offer to coach home games at Madison Square Garden next season, with current coach Kurt Rambis running the team on the road, according to�ESPN's Ramona Shelburne. That deal was reportedly once given to late�Los Angeles Lakers�owner Jerry Buss, which he ultimately rejected. Considering his....


userpete1037
LNS HOF Gold
Posts: 19935
Location: Kobe, Kalifornia
us.gif
votes: 18

^^^

That team needs to be built around Porzingis. I could see the triangle working around him. Having said that, I have a feeling Melo will waive his no trade clause this summer.


kkennon1
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 14286
Location: Phoenix, AZ
us.gif
votes: 23

Now this scares me!!!

Eric Pincus�Verified account�‏@EricPincus

My read is Phil isn't a "just in case" situation - more of a substantial probability - unless Lakers win quick

Howard Beck�Verified account�‏@HowardBeck

Theory floating around league: Lakers keep Byron 1 more year, just in case Phil opts out and returns to L.A. and wants to pick the coach.


kerby720
Die-Hard Laker Fan
Posts: 2124
votes: 12

kkennon1 wrote:
Now this scares me!!!

Eric Pincus�Verified account�‏@EricPincus

My read is Phil isn't a "just in case" situation - more of a substantial probability - unless Lakers win quick

Howard Beck�Verified account�‏@HowardBeck

Theory floating around league: Lakers keep Byron 1 more year, just in case Phil opts out and returns to L.A. and wants to pick the coach.


userpete1037
LNS HOF Gold
Posts: 19935
Location: Kobe, Kalifornia
us.gif
votes: 18

kkennon1 wrote:
Now this scares me!!!

Eric Pincus�Verified account�‏@EricPincus

My read is Phil isn't a "just in case" situation - more of a substantial probability - unless Lakers win quick

Howard Beck�Verified account�‏@HowardBeck

Theory floating around league: Lakers keep Byron 1 more year, just in case Phil opts out and returns to L.A. and wants to pick the coach.

I always said don't be surprised if B. Scott is back next year.


Tempy
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 12758
Location: El Pueblo de la Reina de Los Angeles
calif.gif
votes: 50

kkennon1 wrote:
Now this scares me!!!

Eric Pincus�Verified account�‏@EricPincus

My read is Phil isn't a "just in case" situation - more of a substantial probability - unless Lakers win quick

Howard Beck�Verified account�‏@HowardBeck

Theory floating around league: Lakers keep Byron 1 more year, just in case Phil opts out and returns to L.A. and wants to pick the coach.

I really don't think this happens. If Jeanie has the balls to fire Jim and then tries to bring in Phil who will be almost 72 at that point, I see a power struggle occurring with the family.

When Buss passed the ownership on to his six children the provision was they all had an equal vote. All Jim needs to do is show what PJ has done with the Knicks (nothing) and the move would essentially be blocked if he can convince 2 of his siblings to agree with him.


Tempy
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 12758
Location: El Pueblo de la Reina de Los Angeles
calif.gif
votes: 50

kerby720 wrote:

Lmao exactly!


TERRY-TEAGLE
Laker GM
Posts: 3664
Location: Belmont Shores,CA
votes: 41

kkennon1 wrote:
Now this scares me!!!

Eric Pincus�Verified account�‏@EricPincus

My read is Phil isn't a "just in case" situation - more of a substantial probability - unless Lakers win quick

Howard Beck�Verified account�‏@HowardBeck

Theory floating around league: Lakers keep Byron 1 more year, just in case Phil opts out and returns to L.A. and wants to pick the coach.


userpete1037
LNS HOF Gold
Posts: 19935
Location: Kobe, Kalifornia
us.gif
votes: 18

TERRY-TEAGLE wrote:

ROTFL!!!!!!......Classic.


Shepherd
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 10964

ez.gif
votes: 55

Is that John Salley? LOL


userpete1037
LNS HOF Gold
Posts: 19935
Location: Kobe, Kalifornia
us.gif
votes: 18

Shepherd wrote:
Is that John Salley? LOL

Lol....I thougt it was TT....lol. Just messing with ya TT.


MAGICLAKEZ
LNS HOF Gold
Posts: 16559
Location: Los Angeles, California
us.gif
votes: 70

userpete1037 wrote:
Lol....I thougt it was TT....lol. Just messing with ya TT.

Lmao!!!!


TERRY-TEAGLE
Laker GM
Posts: 3664
Location: Belmont Shores,CA
votes: 41

Lol... My Porn days are over


userpete1037
LNS HOF Gold
Posts: 19935
Location: Kobe, Kalifornia
us.gif
votes: 18

TERRY-TEAGLE wrote:
Lol... My Porn days are over

Lol!!!!


kkennon1
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 14286
Location: Phoenix, AZ
us.gif
votes: 23


Repped High Quality Post

This doesn't sound good at all!!

https://mobile.twitter.com/forumbluegol ... 9884879873


Tempy
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 12758
Location: El Pueblo de la Reina de Los Angeles
calif.gif
votes: 50

kkennon1 wrote:

Tbh nothing we didn't know already.


LALA-LandShow24
Big-Time Laker Fan
Posts: 571
votes: 2
kkennon1 wrote:
This doesn't sound good at all!! https://mobile.twitter.com/forumbluegold/status/747810259884879873
Its just revealing what everyone has known. Jim and Jennie are not on the same page. If Jim fails to improve significantly (forget conference finals, I think even to be a 7/8 seed in the playoffs) Jennie will finally use her power to remove Jim and possibly Mitch. In which case I hope that they go after a fresh face to be the President of Basketball Operations as well as promoting Ryan West to GM and Jesse Buss to remain Director of Scouting and Personnel. Ryan and Jesse ( I believe) are the ones behind....


Shepherd
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 10964

ez.gif
votes: 55
kkennon1 wrote:
This doesn't sound good at all!! https://mobile.twitter.com/forumbluegold/status/747810259884879873
Awesome find! Repped! I must say I feel very vindicated in my recent opinions by this well written, researched and knowledgeable article. It all rings true for me and as I've been saying for years. The team is living in the past, resting on it's laurels. Since they don't have the vision to move forward or the training or experience or talent (FO wise) to do so. In part because it's run by siblings of a man who built it, who don't know what they're doing. In part due to family dynamics. They rely....


Shepherd
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 10964

ez.gif
votes: 55

LALA-LandShow24 wrote:
Its just revealing what everyone has known. Jim and Jennie are not on the same page. If Jim fails to improve significantly (forget conference finals, I think even to be a 7/8 seed in the playoffs) Jennie will finally use her power to remove Jim and possibly Mitch.

In which case I hope that they go after a fresh face to be the President of Basketball Operations as well as promoting Ryan West to GM and Jesse Buss to remain Director of Scouting and Personnel. Ryan and Jesse ( I believe) are the ones behind the last 3 successful drafts for the Lakers and I think they both have an eye for Talent. Some of it has been luck with the Lakers having lottery picks (two of which were #2 picks) but there is also Clarkson, Nance and Zubac.

I think what they have is a brain, a work ethic and a non sense of entitlement by being raised outside of LA. Unlike the LA based Buss kids. And that's a good thing. LA is, among other things, not a good place to raise kids. The air is poisoned here, and not just with smog. I like your suggestions. And btw Jim Buss is overdue to resign by a year but he extended it himself last season until the end of next season. It should have been now. In fact he privately told pple last season he'd still resign if we didn't make the playoffs this past season. Now that says a lot about how disconnected the guy is. If he really thought the team we had, in Kobe's swansong, was going to ever sniff the playoffs. Wow. If Jeannie had any real business sense she'd fire his azz right now. They don't even talk. SO what's the point in dragging it out? Jim is still too distracted by his fav sport horses, and trying to get an indoor soccer team here than to dedicate himself to the Lakers.


MAGICLAKEZ
LNS HOF Gold
Posts: 16559
Location: Los Angeles, California
us.gif
votes: 70

Tempy wrote:
Tbh nothing we didn't know already.

Yeah the same stuff with extra DJ remix and embellishments. Typical Kevin Ding...lol. I firmly believe winning will cure all woes. When you hit rock bottom the only way is up. Either you feel bad for yourself and get stuck in the rut or work your way up.

It is no secret that you don't have to like your colleagues/associates/partners in order to succeed. As long as they show tangible results I'm willing to live with the melodrama/ family soap opera.


userpete1037
LNS HOF Gold
Posts: 19935
Location: Kobe, Kalifornia
us.gif
votes: 18

Dam who dug this thread up...lol!!!!!!


kkennon1
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 14286
Location: Phoenix, AZ
us.gif
votes: 23

MAGICLAKEZ wrote:
Yeah the same stuff with extra DJ remix and embellishments. Typical Kevin Ding...lol. I firmly believe winning will cure all woes. When you hit rock bottom the only way is up. Either you feel bad for yourself and get stuck in the rut or work your way up.

It is no secret that you don't have to like your colleagues/associates/partners in order to succeed. As long as they show tangible results I'm willing to live with the melodrama/ family soap opera.

Sounds like Jeanie has her own agenda and the Lakers might pay the price, if any of this is true.

https://mobile.twitter.com/LakersSBN/st ... 4378967040


LALA-LandShow24
Big-Time Laker Fan
Posts: 571
votes: 2

Shepherd wrote:
Jim is still too distracted by his fav sport horses, and trying to get an indoor soccer team here than to dedicate himself to the Lakers.

This is further evidence that he should not be running the Lakers basketball operations. I get looking into other endeavors (possibly to have something of your own that doesn't include the other siblings) but the PRIORITY should be the LAKERS. After all, the is where he will be getting his cash to get into other endeavors. If Lakers are winning it definitely means more cash flow.

I just hope that Phil stays in NY for as long as possible. I don't want him as President. Lakers should go after one of the Spurs Executives. I know sort of Cliche but that organization has top notch leaders. Maybe even try to pry away the Thunders GM to be President of Lakers BBall Ops. I like that he makes bold moves and still keeps his teams competiive.


Luke...
Die-Hard Laker Fan
 Avatar
Posts: 1987

us.gif
votes: 12


Repped High Quality Post

ugh and sigh at the timing of that new Kevin Ding article is really bad. Everything is probably all correct, and maybe he was even being nice about it... but that timing makes him a big ol jerk, sigh.

Why would you put out that article days before free agency unless you are trying to scare players away from the team?

He knows it will do so.

He accepted that it will.

Did he also accept a more than normal fee for that article because of the timing?

If not a fee, then he at least knew he would get a ton of traction and online traffic because of the timing of this.

I am not into conspiracies, as I usually believe that the simpler answer is almost always the correct one. But that article makes me think greed was definitely involved, and uncaring about the negative affect that would have to the teams chances of signing free agents is definitely there.

here's my headlines:

Kevin Ding on Mission to Scare Away Free Agents.

Kevin Ding Received Bribes.

Kevin Ding Hates the Lakers.

meh, lol whatever... basically: Kevin Ding is a Jerk!


Shepherd
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 10964

ez.gif
votes: 55

I think it was good. Airing it all out. Making it known. Until now it's all be speculated anyways. Now everyone can see what it is and know better how to address it. Opaque operations never work. Transparency is the new thing. Maybe it will force the family to have to deal with their issues as well


kkennon1
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 14286
Location: Phoenix, AZ
us.gif
votes: 23

Luke... wrote:
ugh and sigh at the timing of that new Kevin Ding article is really bad. Everything is probably all correct, and maybe he was even being nice about it... but that timing makes him a big ol jerk, sigh.

Why would you put out that article days before free agency unless you are trying to scare players away from the team?

He knows it will do so.

He accepted that it will.

Did he also accept a more than normal fee for that article because of the timing?

If not a fee, then he at least knew he would get a ton of traction and online traffic because of the timing of this.

I am not into conspiracies, as I usually believe that the simpler answer is almost always the correct one. But that article makes me think greed was definitely involved, and uncaring about the negative affect that would have to the teams chances of signing free agents is definitely there.

here's my headlines:

Kevin Ding on Mission to Scare Away Free Agents.

Kevin Ding Received Bribes.

Kevin Ding Hates the Lakers.

meh, lol whatever... basically: Kevin Ding is a Jerk!

From that 2nd article I posted, it sounds like someone thinks Jeanie is the one that Bribed him. Lol


Luke...
Die-Hard Laker Fan
Posts: 1987

us.gif
votes: 12

kkennon1 wrote:
From that 2nd article I posted, it sounds like someone thinks Jeanie is the one that Bribed him. Lol

woah, I honestly hadn't even read this 2nd article when I made my post. I has only read the new Ding article linked on my bleacher report app feed.

I went back and read the article you posted earlier and dang, just dang

Peeps be stealing my free agency hope dangit


Tempy
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 12758
Location: El Pueblo de la Reina de Los Angeles
calif.gif
votes: 50

LALA-LandShow24 wrote:
This is further evidence that he should not be running the Lakers basketball operations. I get looking into other endeavors (possibly to have something of your own that doesn't include the other siblings) but the PRIORITY should be the LAKERS. After all, the is where he will be getting his cash to get into other endeavors. If Lakers are winning it definitely means more cash flow.

I just hope that Phil stays in NY for as long as possible. I don't want him as President. Lakers should go after one of the Spurs Executives. I know sort of Cliche but that organization has top notch leaders. Maybe even try to pry away the Thunders GM to be President of Lakers BBall Ops. I like that he makes bold moves and still keeps his teams competiive.

You guys crack me up. So he is not allowed to live his life? After the trade deadline what exactly is he supposed to be doing?

He has a scouting department scouting players, reporting to him what their opinions are. That's plenty of down time to pursue other ventures. Does shark tank detract from what Cuban does with the Mavs?


kkennon1
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 14286
Location: Phoenix, AZ
us.gif
votes: 23

Tempy wrote:
You guys crack me up. So he is not allowed to live his life? After the trade deadline what exactly is he supposed to be doing?

He has a scouting department scouting players, reporting to him what their opinions are. That's plenty of down time to pursue other ventures. Does shark tank detract from what Cuban does with the Mavs?

Agree, people are entitled to have other things going on in their lives. Besides if that story is true and Jeanie is the one that leaked story to Ding, than I'd say Lakers have a bigger problem than I originally thought.


TERRY-TEAGLE
Laker GM
Posts: 3664
Location: Belmont Shores,CA
votes: 41

$$$ post Luke

F*ck Kevin Ding Dong


kerby720
Die-Hard Laker Fan
Posts: 2124
votes: 12

I know Kevin Ding wrote this story, but this has Jeanie's fingerprints all over it. I hope I'm wrong, but why would you ever purposefully torpedo the chances that the team you own has for signing FA. It just doesn't make any sense to me. Unless of course, she really wants to rid herself of Jim and Mitch, so she can bring her boytoy back to the Lakers. *puke*


Shepherd
LNS HOF Silver
Posts: 10964

ez.gif
votes: 55

kerby720 wrote:
I know Kevin Ding wrote this story, but this has Jeanie's fingerprints all over it. I hope I'm wrong, but why would you ever purposefully torpedo the chances that the team you own has for signing FA. It just doesn't make any sense to me. Unless of course, she really wants to rid herself of Jim and Mitch, so she can bring her boytoy back to the Lakers. *puke*

Mitch and Jim (the Inept Bros) need to be gone. But no Phil in their place pls. We need to break up Phil and Jeannie so she's not so distracted by a long distance relationship. And so I can take a shot at her lol


kerby720
Die-Hard Laker Fan
Posts: 2124
votes: 12

Shepherd wrote:
Mitch and Jim (the Inept Bros) need to be gone. But no Phil in their place pls. We need to break up Phil and Jeannie so she's not so distracted by a long distance relationship. And so I can take a shot at her lol

Be my guest man haha. Even if she were drop dead gorgeous (which she is far from IMO), her personality doesn't seem all that great either.


JJCali
LNS HOF Bronze
Posts: 8543

us.gif
votes: 22

userpete1037 wrote:
Dam who dug this thread up...lol!!!!!!

Lol, right!


JJCali
LNS HOF Bronze
Posts: 8543

us.gif
votes: 22

Shepherd wrote:
Mitch and Jim (the Inept Bros) need to be gone. But no Phil in their place pls. We need to break up Phil and Jeannie so she's not so distracted by a long distance relationship. And so I can take a shot at her lol

Lmao! Nice post!


Options Quick Reply: RE: Rumor: Jim Buss Fired! Jeanie "Cleaning House"
register
You are an anonymous user- or .
Quote the last message
Attach signature (signatures can be changed in profile)
Notify me when a reply is posted
Don't Check Spelling
Note: Twitter & Youtube BBCODE Tags are no longer necessary. The system will automatically convert links to tweets & youtube videos.
   
 
Go To the Top of the ThreadGo Home
Post new topic   Reply to topic
register
You are an anonymous user- Register now or Log in Now!


Add our Los Angeles Lakers Blog RSS Feed, the Lakers Rumors RSS Feed, the Lakers News RSS feed, and the Lakers Forum RSS feed to get the latest Laker News and Rumors and Lakers Game info in your RSS/XML reader!